Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40412822›Full record

SynthesisArchives of disease in childhood2025

Role of complete blood count in the diagnosis of culture-proven neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Emily Hyde, Mark Anthony, Stephen Kennedy, Manu Vatish

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of disease in childhood, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily HydeNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK emily.hyde@wrh.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7570-9933
Mark AnthonyNewborn Care Unit, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Stephen KennedyNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Manu VatishNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeonatal sepsis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in preterm infants. Despite its routine use in adults, the diagnostic utility of complete blood count (CBC) in neonatal sepsis remains debated. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CBC parameters for neonatal sepsis.

methodsThis review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023476510). MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched from database inception to 28 October 2024. Observational studies of neonates with sepsis, published in English, were included. Pooled diagnostic accuracy metrics were calculated for CBC parameters, including the white cell count (WCC), neutrophil count and immature-to-total neutrophil ratio (ITR). Bias was assessed using a modified QUADAS-2 tool.

resultsFunctional CBC parameters like ITR and mean neutrophil volume (MNV) showed moderate diagnostic accuracy. Pooled analysis revealed that an ITR >0.20 had 66.3% sensitivity and 85.4% specificity for neonatal sepsis. MNV also showed promising diagnostic utility, but substantial heterogeneity across studies (I

conclusionsThe CBC is a rapid, cost-effective test requiring minimal blood volume, making it a practical adjunct in neonatal diagnostics. Functional parameters like ITR and MNV show the potential to complement existing approaches but are insufficient as stand-alone diagnostic tools. Further research is needed to validate their clinical utility and address heterogeneity in study designs.

Indexed as

Neonatal SepsisBlood Cell CountHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLeukocyte CountNeutrophilsSensitivity and SpecificityHaematologyIntensive Care Units, NeonatalNeonatologySepsis

Identifiers

PMID40412822
PMCPMC12505116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.