Observational studyBMJ open quality2025
Improving cardiac care with Positive Health and lifestyle interventions: a patient journey in a peripheral hospital setting.
Observational study in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing focus on health promotion and preventive healthcare is essential in reducing cardiovascular disease burdens. Positive Health (PH), centred on adaptability and self-management, presents a promising approach to enhance cardiac care. This study explores the integration of PH and lifestyle interventions within cardiac care, pinpointing areas for improvement through a patient journey analysis. This qualitative observational study uses a patient journey approach to analyse the integration of PH principles in cardiac care. A qualitative approach included a semistructured interview with a cardiac patient and a focus group with ten healthcare professionals, segmented into three stages: initial signal and examination, diagnosis and treatment and post-treatment follow-up. Thematic analysis revealed three key themes: communication, self-direction and personalised lifestyle modifications. Communication gaps among healthcare providers and towards the patient led to inefficiencies in care delivery. Although self-direction in care was encouraged, maintaining lifestyle changes proved difficult due to limited personalised support and motivation. Strengthening communication and providing tailored, sustainable lifestyle interventions are crucial to enhancing patient satisfaction, promoting enduring behavioural changes and achieving better cardiac outcomes. The patient journey method offers valuable insights into patient needs, facilitating the collaborative, integrated care improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.