Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40412483›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2026

Fish oil reduces intestinal fat absorption by promoting lacteal junction zippering via GPR120-VEGFR3-MLCK pathway.

Junfeng Wang, Liling Cai, Jinhao Liu, Fenglin Zhang, Gonghao Zhang, Haoyan Kang, Guo Ren, Lidong Yan, Yue Zhang, Zhe Pan and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Junfeng WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Liling CaiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Jinhao LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Fenglin ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, Jiangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanchang 330200, PR China.
Gonghao ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Haoyan KangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Guo RenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Lidong YanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Yue ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Zhe PanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Shilong LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Canjun ZhuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Ruifan WuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Lina WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Gang ShuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Qingyan JiangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Songbo WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition Control, National Engineering Research Center for Breeding Swine Industry and State Key Laboratory of Swine and Poultry Breeding Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China; Yunfu Branch, Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Research Institute of Wens Foodstuff Group Co., Ltd., Xinxing 527400, PR China. Electronic address: songbowang@scau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiet-induced obesity can be improved by reducing intestinal fat absorption. Fish oil, enriched in n-3 PUFAs such as DHA and EPA, has shown promise in weight reduction. However, the role of fish oil in regulating intestinal fat absorption and the possible underlying mechanism remains largely unknown.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to understand the mechanism underlying the fish oil elicited anti-obesity effects.

methodsHFD-fed mice were subjected to fish oil and lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) were treated with DHA or EPA. The intestinal fat absorption, the lacteal zipper-like junctions, and the involvement of GPR120-VEGFR3-MLCK pathway were assessed.

resultsWe found that fish oil gavage suppressed intestinal fat absorption associated with elevated proportion of lacteal zipper-like junctions and decreased expression of VEGFR3 in mice jejunum. Meanwhile, inhibition of VEGFR3 signaling in HFD-fed mice enhanced zipper-like junctions in jejunal lacteal to reduce fat absorption and combat obesity. In addition, DHA and EPA increased the proportion of zipper-like junctions via downregulation of VEGFR3 signaling in PA-treated LECs. However, activation of VEGFR3 signaling with VEGFC or inhibition of GPR120 with AH-7614 totally blocked the elevation of zipper-like junctions induced by DHA and EPA. Furthermore, DHA and EPA inhibited MLCK signaling in a GPR120-VEGFR3 dependent manner and inhibition of MLCK mimicked the promotive effects of DHA and EPA on zipper-like junctions. These in vitro results suggested that DHA and EPA increased the proportion of zipper-like junctions in PA-treated LECs through the GPR120-VEGFR3-MLCK signaling pathway. Finally, fish oil supplementation reduced intestinal fat absorption, promoted lacteal zipper-like junctions, enhanced GPR120 expression, inhibited VEGFR3 expression and MLCK signaling.

conclusionOverall, these findings showed for the first time that fish oil reduced intestinal fat absorption by promoting lacteal junctions zippering via GPR120-VEGFR3-MLCK pathway.

Indexed as

Fish OilsIntestinal AbsorptionReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3AnimalsDiet, High-FatDocosahexaenoic AcidsEndothelial CellsJejunumMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLObesitySignal TransductionDocosahexaenoic AcidsFFAR4 protein, mouseFish OilsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-3Fat absorptionFish oilGPR120-VEGFR3-MLCK pathwayLacteal zipper-like junctionsLymphatic endothelial cells (LECs)

Identifiers

PMID40412483
PMCPMC12869197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.