ArticleCell reports. Medicine2025
Minimally invasive diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions using single-cell peripheral immune atlas.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of a modified MSRE-qPCR method for detecting circulating cell-free DNA methylation in cervical cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Vitamin D, immune microenvironment, and cervical lesions: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies from polyps to carcinoma.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains a major global health concern for women. Current screening methods are either invasive or lead to low participation and over-referral for colposcopy, particularly among high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive women. This study analyzes 613 participants with varying cervical lesions using mass cytometry by time-of-flight (CyTOF) to identify disease-specific peripheral immune signatures. A diagnostic model based on 23 immune features achieves ∼91% sensitivity and specificity for detecting precancerous and cancerous lesions. A separate model for HPV-positive women shows even higher accuracy (∼93% sensitivity, ∼95% specificity), especially in HPV16/18-positive cases (99% sensitivity, 100% specificity). In an independent validation cohort (n = 105), the model distinguishes cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ from ≤CIN1 with 86.5% sensitivity and 85.3% specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.89). These findings support peripheral immune profiling as a minimally invasive and accurate biomarker strategy for early cervical cancer screening, particularly in HPV16/18-positive women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.