ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026
Development of a Heart Rate Variability Based Ambulatory Stress Detection Model for Clinical Populations.
Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Daily Stress and Heart Rate Variability Among Mindfulness Meditation Practitioners: mHealth Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biosensor-based, real-time stress detection has generated clinical interest for the purpose of driving just-in-time interventions that support recovery from mental disorders. Most stress detection models to date, however, have been trained with laboratory-based data from homogenous samples of healthy adults, and do not perform as well in clinical populations. As an initial step toward the development of a stress detection algorithm that functions well in clinical populations, we tested a series of stress-detection machine learning models on ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) and daily ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data collected from a sample of individuals in early recovery from alcohol use disorder (AUD). Forty-four individuals ages 18-65 in the first year of a current AUD recovery attempt wore an ECG monitor for 4 days, while concurrently completing 3-times-daily EMA of stress. Data were segmented and normalized. Target features were identified using unsupervised learning models (e.g., t-SNE, cluster analysis) and supervised learning models were tuned to optimize model performance. As a comparator, we also tested these models with laboratory-derived stress data from a sample of healthy young adults. Before accounting for individual characteristics, we achieved a modest accuracy of 63% in our clinical sample, which compared to 94% accuracy in the laboratory-derived healthy young adult sample. After accounting for age and body-mass-index (BMI) we increased model accuracy up to 80% in our clinical sample. Stress detection is challenging in clinical populations; however, better prediction is possible with data normalization and stratification considering age and BMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.