Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40411737›Full record

ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026

Development of a Heart Rate Variability Based Ambulatory Stress Detection Model for Clinical Populations.

Richard Fletcher, Katherine Zeng, Ming Ying Yang, Agata Pietrzak, David Eddie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Richard FletcherDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
Katherine ZengRecovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 151 Merrimac St. 4 th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Ming Ying YangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA.
Agata PietrzakRecovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 151 Merrimac St. 4 th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
David EddieRecovery Research Institute, Center for Addiction Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 151 Merrimac St. 4 th Floor, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. deddie@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Bringing real-time stress detection to scale: Development of a biosensor driven, stress detection classifier for smartwatchesK23AA027577 · NIAAA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDDIE, DAVID · 2020 to 2024
$919k
Elucidating the role of cognitive and physiological aspects of affect in alcohol use relapseF32AA025251 · NIAAA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDDIE, DAVID · 2016 to 2017
$121k
NIAAA NIH HHS F32 AA025251NIAAA NIH HHS F32AA025251NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA027577NIAAA NIH HHS L30 AA026135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosensor-based, real-time stress detection has generated clinical interest for the purpose of driving just-in-time interventions that support recovery from mental disorders. Most stress detection models to date, however, have been trained with laboratory-based data from homogenous samples of healthy adults, and do not perform as well in clinical populations. As an initial step toward the development of a stress detection algorithm that functions well in clinical populations, we tested a series of stress-detection machine learning models on ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) and daily ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data collected from a sample of individuals in early recovery from alcohol use disorder (AUD). Forty-four individuals ages 18-65 in the first year of a current AUD recovery attempt wore an ECG monitor for 4 days, while concurrently completing 3-times-daily EMA of stress. Data were segmented and normalized. Target features were identified using unsupervised learning models (e.g., t-SNE, cluster analysis) and supervised learning models were tuned to optimize model performance. As a comparator, we also tested these models with laboratory-derived stress data from a sample of healthy young adults. Before accounting for individual characteristics, we achieved a modest accuracy of 63% in our clinical sample, which compared to 94% accuracy in the laboratory-derived healthy young adult sample. After accounting for age and body-mass-index (BMI) we increased model accuracy up to 80% in our clinical sample. Stress detection is challenging in clinical populations; however, better prediction is possible with data normalization and stratification considering age and BMI.

Indexed as

AlcoholismEcological Momentary AssessmentElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryHeart RateMachine LearningStress, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAlcohol use disorderClinical samplesHeart rate variabilityMachine learningStress detection

Identifiers

PMID40411737
PMCPMC12640683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.