ReviewDrugs2025
A Clinical Pharmacological Perspective on Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.
Review in Drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Catheter based intraperitoneal chemotherapy using taxane for peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer: from bench to bedside-a narrative review.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026Review
- Current Approaches and Emerging Strategies in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Review
- Pressurized intraperitoneal cold atmospheric plasma as a novel therapeutic strategy for peritoneal metastatic carcinoma.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Multicenter dose de-escalation phase I trial of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC) nab-paclitaxel and cisplatin in combination with systemic nab-paclitaxel in recurrent ovarian cancer patients: trial in progress.Pleura and peritoneum · 2026Article
- Combined Intraperitoneal and Systemic Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Metastases: Drug Delivery Concepts, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Applications: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Early postoperative morbidity and short-term outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal surface malignancies: initial single-center experience from Palestine.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Nanomedicine in Ovarian Cancer: Advances in Imaging, Targeted Delivery, and Theranostic Therapeutic Platforms.Cancers · 2025Review
- Pan-cancer clinicopathological and genomic characteristics of peritoneal metastasis.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Multi-dimensional omics integrated machine learning framework identifies macrophage-fibroblast-tumor co-infiltration patterns to predict prognosis in gastric cancer.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Prophylactic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is associated with improved disease-free survival in pathologic T4 colorectal cancer: a propensity score-matched cohort study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- What is worth knowing about peritoneal metastases in colorectal cancer?Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Neoadjuvant hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: impact on chemotherapy response score and prognosis in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peritoneal metastases (PM), frequently observed in malignancies such as ovarian, colorectal, pancreatic, and gastric cancers, present a significant therapeutic challenge due to poor prognosis and limited effectiveness to systemic chemotherapy. The peritoneal-plasma barrier reduces effective drug transfer from plasma to the peritoneal cavity, reducing cytotoxic effects on PM. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy offers a locoregional approach, enabling high local drug concentrations that can enhance therapeutic efficacy while limiting systemic toxicity. The three major methods for IP administration-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), and catheter-based IP (CBIP) chemotherapy-each provide unique pharmacokinetic (PK) advantages for PM treatment. This review provides a comprehensive update on the pharmacological rationale of IP chemotherapy, focusing on drug characteristics that support extended IP retention and effective tumor targeting. The effects of administration variables are discussed, highlighting their role in optimizing IP drug exposure. Additionally, recent PK data on commonly used drugs in IP therapy, including platinum-based agents, taxanes, and novel nanoparticle formulations, will be evaluated. While PK rationale supports the administration of IP chemotherapy, further efficacy results from ongoing clinical trials are still awaited. Innovations in nanoparticle-based formulations and controlled-release systems offer substantial potential for improving both drug retention and targeted delivery, enhancing treatment precision and minimizing systemic toxicity. Continued exploration in these areas, along with optimization of IP administration protocols, is vital for advancing patient outcomes, refining therapeutic strategies, and maximizing the benefits of IP chemotherapy in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.