Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40411722›Full record

ReviewDrugs2025

A Clinical Pharmacological Perspective on Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

Pascale C S Rietveld, Niels A D Guchelaar, Sebastiaan D T Sassen, Birgit C P Koch, Ron H J Mathijssen, Stijn L W Koolen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Catheter based intraperitoneal chemotherapy using taxane for peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer: from bench to bedside-a narrative review.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pascale C S RietveldDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. p.rietveld@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6039-8458
Niels A D GuchelaarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan D T SassenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Birgit C P KochDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Ron H J MathijssenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Stijn L W KoolenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peritoneal metastases (PM), frequently observed in malignancies such as ovarian, colorectal, pancreatic, and gastric cancers, present a significant therapeutic challenge due to poor prognosis and limited effectiveness to systemic chemotherapy. The peritoneal-plasma barrier reduces effective drug transfer from plasma to the peritoneal cavity, reducing cytotoxic effects on PM. Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy offers a locoregional approach, enabling high local drug concentrations that can enhance therapeutic efficacy while limiting systemic toxicity. The three major methods for IP administration-hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), and catheter-based IP (CBIP) chemotherapy-each provide unique pharmacokinetic (PK) advantages for PM treatment. This review provides a comprehensive update on the pharmacological rationale of IP chemotherapy, focusing on drug characteristics that support extended IP retention and effective tumor targeting. The effects of administration variables are discussed, highlighting their role in optimizing IP drug exposure. Additionally, recent PK data on commonly used drugs in IP therapy, including platinum-based agents, taxanes, and novel nanoparticle formulations, will be evaluated. While PK rationale supports the administration of IP chemotherapy, further efficacy results from ongoing clinical trials are still awaited. Innovations in nanoparticle-based formulations and controlled-release systems offer substantial potential for improving both drug retention and targeted delivery, enhancing treatment precision and minimizing systemic toxicity. Continued exploration in these areas, along with optimization of IP administration protocols, is vital for advancing patient outcomes, refining therapeutic strategies, and maximizing the benefits of IP chemotherapy in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyPeritoneal NeoplasmsAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNanoparticlesAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID40411722
PMCPMC12185600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.