ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2025
Improved image quality and reduced acquisition time in prostate T2-weighted spin-echo MRI using a modified PI-RADS-adherent sequence.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimal Selection of the Effective Echo Time (TEJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Digital twin technologies in prostate cancer as a frontier for precision medicine.European radiology experimental · 2026Review
- Dual-conditioned diffusion model with anatomical guidance for geometric distortion correction in prostate MRI.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Prostate T2-weighted spin-echo MRI with and without glucagon: a paired scan quality assessment.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProstate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) v2.1 guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging acquisition define a standard of 0.40 mm × 0.70 mm in-plane resolution (0.280 mm
methodsAn adherent T2WI sequence was modified by reducing the frequency sampling, thereby reducing the signal bandwidth (BW). This was compensated by increasing the phase sampling for an equivalent pixel area (0.50 mm × 0.57 mm = 0.285 mm
resultsIn the phantom, mean signal-to-noise ratios were equivalent for the two sequences; superior frequency resolution for the adherent sequence, and superior phase resolution for the modified sequence were shown. Across 62 participants, the median acquisition time was reduced by 23%, from 3:55 min:s to 3:01 min:s. For all three means of comparison (DQ, PI-QUALv2, reader preference), the modified sequence was significantly superior (p ≤ 0.037).
conclusionModification of the PI-RADS standard (0.40-mm frequency resolution) to an equivalent, more isotropic pixel area (0.28 mm RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Generalization of the PI-RADSv.2.1 minimum technical standard for T2WI in-plane resolution to be more isotropic preserves the targeted high resolution, allowing reduced acquisition time, also reducing motion sensitivity, and improving image quality. This approach may also reduce the need for rescanning poor-quality sequences. KEY POINTS: PI-RADSv2.1 suggests a standard T2WI sequence with 0.40 × 0.70 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.