Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40411691›Full record

ArticleCVIR endovascular2025

Controlled expansion stent grafts versus legacy stent grafts for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a single-centre retrospective study on the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy.

Afonso Fonseca, Rui Ramos, Élia Coimbra, António Caetano, Teresa Neves, Rafaela Pereira, Inês Conde Vasco, Marta Alves, Tiago Bilhim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CVIR endovascular, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expandable Constrained Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: An Individualised Approach for High-Risk Patients?Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Afonso FonsecaInterventional Radiology Unit, Curry Cabral Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Rui RamosInterventional Radiology Unit, Unidade Local de Saúde Trás-Os-Montes E Alto Douro, Vila Real, Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6511-6181
Élia CoimbraInterventional Radiology Unit, Curry Cabral Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9613-4553
António CaetanoInterventional Radiology Unit, Curry Cabral Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2516-324X
Teresa NevesInterventional Radiology Unit, Curry Cabral Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2225-5613
Rafaela PereiraInterventional Radiology Unit, Curry Cabral Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Inês Conde VascoInterventional Radiology Unit, Curry Cabral Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7418-551X
Marta AlvesEpidemiology and Statistics Unit, Research Center, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7421-8550
Tiago BilhimInterventional Radiology Unit, Curry Cabral Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde São José, Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal. tiagobilhim@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3044-8474

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAssess incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients treated with 8-10 mm Controlled Expansion diameter VIATORR® (VCX) versus 10 mm diameter first-generation VIATORR® (Legacy) stent-grafts. MATERIALS AND

methodsSingle-centre retrospective study (January 2015 to March 2024), including 132 adult patients with cirrhosis treated with TIPS due to complications of portal hypertension. Outcomes included post-TIPS new onset overt HE, ascites response, re-bleeding, mortality and portal pressure gradient (PPG) before and after TIPS. Comparisons used Chi square and Fisher´s exact test for categorical variables and Student´s t test or Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables.

resultsIndication for TIPS was refractory ascites (n = 82) and variceal bleeding (n = 50). The VCX group (n = 85) and the Legacy group (n = 47) had similar new onset overt HE: 37% (31/85) vs 43% (20/47), respectively (p = 0.31); mortality rates (34% [29/85]) vs 39% [18/47], respectively, p = 0.57) and re-bleeding (17% [6/35] vs 20% [3/15], respectively, p = 1.00). Median PPG reduction after TIPS was 10 mmHg (7 - 13) in the VCX group and 12 mmHg (9 - 15) in the Legacy group (p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis revealed post TIPS overt HE rate of 38% (19/50) in the VCX group vs 53% (17/32) in the Legacy group (p = 0.13), with refractory ascites as an indication. Shunt dysfunction rate was 7% (6/85) in the VCX group (stent thrombosis n = 6, stenosis or malpositioning n = 0) and 0% (0/47) in the Legacy group (p = 0.09).

conclusionVCX stent grafts induce an immediate lower PPG reduction, which might lead to more stent dysfunctions, but also to a reduction in post-TIPS HE.

Indexed as

CirrhosisHepatic encephalopathyTransjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic ShuntVariceal bleedingVenous intervention

Identifiers

PMID40411691
PMCPMC12103397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.