ArticleBrain structure & function2025
Classifying athletes and non-athletes by differences in spontaneous brain activity: a machine learning and fMRI study.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Efficiency and Sensorimotor Adaptations in Swimming Athletes: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging and Cognitive-Behavioral Evidence for Performance and Wellbeing.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- The effect of working memory load on interference inhibition in table tennis athletes: the moderating role of motor expertise.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Enhancing national fitness legislation in the context of promoting a healthy China.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Different types of sports training can induce distinct changes in brain activity and function; however, it remains unclear if there are commonalities across various sports disciplines. Moreover, the relationship between these brain activity alterations and the duration of sports training requires further investigation. This study employed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) techniques to analyze spontaneous brain activity using the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (ALFF) and fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) in 86 highly trained athletes compared to 74 age- and gender-matched non-athletes. Our findings revealed significantly higher ALFF values in the Insula_R (Right Insula), OFCpost_R (Right Posterior orbital gyrus), and OFClat_R (Right Lateral orbital gyrus) in athletes compared to controls, whereas fALFF in the Postcentral_R (Right Postcentral) was notably higher in controls. Additionally, we identified a significant negative correlation between fALFF values in the Postcentral_R of athletes and their years of professional training. Utilizing machine learning algorithms, we achieved accurate classification of brain activity patterns distinguishing athletes from non-athletes with over 96.97% accuracy. These results suggest that the functional reorganization observed in athletes' brains may signify an adaptation to prolonged training, potentially reflecting enhanced processing efficiency. This study emphasizes the importance of examining the impact of long-term sports training on brain function, which could influence cognitive and sensory systems crucial for optimal athletic performance. Furthermore, machine learning methods could be used in the future to select athletes based on differences in brain activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40411681What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.