ReviewDermatology and therapy2025
A Narrative Review of Pemphigoid Diseases: Bridging Associations, Comorbidities, and Management.
Review in Dermatology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The cutaneous mirror: leveraging drug-induced skin phenotypes as early visual risk signals for systemic toxicity, a comprehensive review.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2026Review
- Thematic Evolution and Diversification of Bullous Pemphigoid Research: A Bibliometric Analysis, 1959-2025.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Platelet-rich therapies in cutaneous and mucocutaneous disorders characterized by inflammatory tissue responses: mechanistic insights and clinical evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Pemphigoid associated with quinolone antibiotics: a real-world pharmacovigilance study of the FDA adverse event reporting system and literature-based evidence.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Dupilumab in a Young Woman with Refractory Cutaneous Lichen Planus: A Case-Based Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pemphigoid diseases are a group of rare, chronic autoimmune blistering disorders (AIBD) characterized by subepidermal blister formation due to autoantibody-mediated targeting of structural components of the basement membrane zone (BMZ). This narrative review provides an updated overview of four key subtypes: bullous pemphigoid (BP), mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), linear IgA bullous dermatosis (LABD), and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) with specific emphasis on disease associations that dermatologists should be aware of for comprehensive patient care. BP, the most common subepidermal blistering disorder, is frequently associated with neurological and cardiovascular comorbidities, while MMP primarily affects mucosal surfaces, often leading to significant scarring and functional impairment and can be associated with malignancy in certain subtypes. LABD and EBA are less common but can be linked with systemic autoimmune conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Shared challenges across these subtypes include difficulties in diagnosis due to overlapping clinical and histopathologic features, treatment-related complications from prolonged corticosteroid use, and the substantial impact on patients' quality of life. Advances in therapeutic strategies, including biologic agents such as rituximab and dupilumab, offer promising alternatives to traditional treatments, yet access to new targeted therapies remains a significant barrier. This review emphasizes the need for large-scale studies to better understand disease associations, the identification of biomarkers for personalized therapy, improved treatment options, and the implementation of multidisciplinary care approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.