Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40411594›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2025

Genealogically bewildered individuals and forensic identification: a review of current and emerging solutions.

Hirak Ranjan Dash, Anubhuti Patel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hirak Ranjan DashDepartment of Forensic Science, National Forensic Sciences University, Delhi Campus, New Delhi, 110085, India. hirakdash@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1954-6452
Anubhuti PatelDepartment of Reproductive Medicine and the Center for Human Reproduction, IMS and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751003, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) with donor gametes is driven by rising infertility rates, delayed parenthood, and the need to prevent hereditary diseases. Greater social acceptance of diverse family structures, advancements in reproductive medicine, and improving success rates also contribute. Accessibility, affordability, and cross-border reproductive care further expand ART's reach, making donor gametes a preferred option for many individuals and couples worldwide. The widespread application of ART has led to an increasing number of donor-conceived individuals, many of whom are now reaching reproductive maturity. This demographic shift introduces significant challenges for traditional forensic genetic identification methods, which rely on biological reference samples from genetically related individuals. The absence of such samples complicates the identification process, particularly for individuals conceived via gamete donation or adoption, where biological and legal parentage are incongruent. Conventional forensic genetic analyses, including short tandem repeat (STR) and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) profiling of autosomal, Y-chromosome, X-chromosome, and mitochondrial DNA, exhibit limited efficacy in these scenarios. While these methods can sometimes identify individuals conceived using a single donor gamete, they are insufficient for cases involving dual donor gametes or mitochondrial replacement therapy. Emerging methodologies such as forensic genetic genealogy, DNA methylation profiling, and human microbiome analysis offer innovative approaches but necessitate further clinical validation and standardization.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingForensic GeneticsPedigreeReproductive Techniques, AssistedChromosomes, Human, YDNA MethylationDNA, MitochondrialFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTissue DonorsDNA, MitochondrialAssisted reproductive technologies (ART)Forensic DNA profilingGamete donationGenealogically bewildered

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.