ReviewCerebellum (London, England)2025
Biomarkers in Spinocerebellar Ataxias.
Review in Cerebellum (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the brain: Polyglutamine disease pathology outside the nervous system.Neurobiology of disease · 2026Review
- Visual evoked potential abnormalities in spinocerebellar ataxia type 27B: a case report.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Developing prognostic models that predict onset and progression rates in genetic neurodegenerative diseases: perspectives of healthcare professionals in genetic counselling.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Integrated Plasma and Glial Cell Evidence Indicates a Functional Role for hsa-miR-342-5p in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 and Its Potential Use as a Biomarker.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Positional nystagmus in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional case-control study.BMC neurology · 2026Observational
- Predicting disease progression in progressive cerebellar ataxias: integrating clinical, imaging, fluid, genetic, and digital biomarkers.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Multiomics approach identifies SERPINB1 as candidate biomarker for spinocerebellar ataxia type 2.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Deep Learning-Based Assessment of Brainstem Volume Changes in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 (SCA2): A Study on Patients and Preclinical Subjects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomarkers are defined as measures that indicate biological processes and responses to interventions. Spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs) are autosomal dominantly inherited, progressive diseases. As targeted therapies for SCAs are being developed, there is a great need for biomarkers for use in clinical trials. Molecular genetic tests are firmly established as diagnostic biomarkers for SCAs. Biomarkers that monitor disease progression are needed in clinical trials that aim at slowing disease progression. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volume measures and- in SCA2 - saccadic velocity are promising candidates, as they have been shown to decrease over time with larger sensitivity than clinical scales. Prognostic biomarkers indicate the likelihood of progression or a future clinical event. Potential candidates are CAG repeat length, blood neurofilament light chain (NfL) concentrations, MRI volume measures, magnetic resonance spectroscopic (MRS) metabolites, digital measures of gait variability and- in SCA2- sensory nerve amplitudes. Response biomarkers, which are capable of detecting a response to an intervention, are essential for interventional trials. In gene silencing trials, the concentrations of the proteins encoded by the targeted genes serve as response biomarkers. To date, assays for expanded ATXN3 are available. NfL has the potential to serve as a response marker across all SCA subtypes, as it is assumed to indicate ongoing neurodegeneration, but available data are yet insufficient. Although development and validation of biomarkers for SCAs are rapidly evolving, there is an urgent need for further, longitudinal, multimodal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.