Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40411533›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2025

Framework for classifying chemicals for repeat dose toxicity using NAMs.

J E Doe, P Botham, D Holland, M Fuart Gatnik, V Giri, H Kang, P Kalra, S León Pérez, S Marty, S Moors and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

J E DoeSchool of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Byrom Street, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5393-1421
P BothamSyngenta, Jealott's Hill International Research Centre, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG42 6EY, UK.
D HollandExxonMobil Petroleum and Chemical, 1831, Machelen, Belgium.
M Fuart GatnikMerck d.o.o., Letališka Cesta 29C, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
V GiriBASF SE, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Carl-Bosch-Str 38, 67056, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6055-6324
H KangLyondellBasell Industries Holdings B.V., 3013 AA, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
P KalraSimulations Plus Inc., Lancaster, USA.
S León PérezECETOC AISBL, Rue Belliard 40, 1040, Brussels, Belgium. sergio.perez@ecetoc.org.ORCID 0009-0006-7281-5702
S MartyDow Chemical Company, Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, 1803 Building, Midland, MI, 48667, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5404-8515
S MoorsBASF Personal Care and Nutrition GmbH, Henkelstrasse 67, Düsseldorf, Germany.
R RaeburnAfton Chemical Limited London Road, Bracknell, Berkshire, RG12 2UW, UK.
E RealeNestlé Research, Société des Produits Nestlé SA, Vers-Chez-Les-Blanc, 1000, Lausanne 26, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0853-0693
R SettivariCorteva Agriscience, Haskell R&D Center, Newark, DE, 19711, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-2963-5224
M SicaEvonik Operations GmbH, 45127, Essen, Germany.
K Z TravisRSA, Largs Yacht Haven, Irvine Road, Largs, KA30 8EZ, UK.
S J WijeyesakereDow Chemical Company, Toxicology and Environmental Research and Consulting, 1803 Building, Midland, MI, 48667, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4275-0438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EPAA's 'NAM Designathon 2023' challenge for human toxicity sought to identify a classification system capable of categorising chemicals based on their bioactivity and bioavailability properties determined using non-animal methodologies (Worth et al. 2025). The proposal is made to classify chemicals into three levels of concern: low concern could be used without restriction, medium concern requiring assessment to establish safe use levels and high concern being candidates requiring risk management (Berggren and Worth in Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 142:105431, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105431 , 2023). We developed a NAMs based classification system for "human systemic toxicity" mainly focussed on repeat dose toxicity, similar to the assessment carried out in classification for 'Specific Target Organ Toxicity-Repeated Exposure' (STOT-RE) based on ECETOC's Tiered Approach integrating three lines of evidence: In silico predictions, In vitro bioavailability and PBK modelling, In vitro bioactivity assays. The first stage employed an in silico approach, covering several toxicity endpoints across various (Q)SAR in silico models to identify indicators of toxicity. Bioavailability was categorised by simulating 14-day plasma C

Indexed as

Hazardous SubstancesToxicity TestsAnimalsBiological AvailabilityComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansModels, BiologicalQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipRisk AssessmentHazardous SubstancesChemical safety assessmentClassification and labellingNew approach methodology (NAM)Next-generation safety assessmentRegulatory toxicologyRisk management

Identifiers

PMID40411533
PMCPMC12367832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.