SynthesisClinical & experimental ophthalmology
Real-World 10-Year Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Real-World 10-Year Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis.Clinical & experimental ophthalmologyPooled it
- AAV-based gene therapies for neovascular AMD.Gene therapy · 2026Review
- Home OCT Monitoring as a Safety Net for Early Detection of Recurrent Disease Activity in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Under Standard Care.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor conundrum.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Bridging evidence worlds: policy and practice pathways for integrating clinical trials and real-world data in drug development and HTA.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- The controversial role of nutraceuticals vs. drugs in proliferative retinopathies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study examines the long-term effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy in managing neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Despite the well-established short-term improvements of anti-VEGF therapy, there is limited data on its continued efficacy over extended periods. This meta-analysis synthesises real-world data to evaluate anti-VEGF therapy's long-term outcomes systematically.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature review across PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases, focusing on studies that reported outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment for nAMD over a decade. The analysis included pooling baseline patient characteristics, study designs, sample sizes and changes in visual acuity (VA) over 10 years.
resultsOur search produced 12 observational studies encompassing 7509 eyes, with 1274 completing 10-years of follow-up. The most substantial improvement in VA was observed in the first year following the initiation of anti-VEGF therapy. On average, there was a decline of 8.11 letters in VA after 10 years from baseline (95% CI -10.83 to -5.39, p < 0.01). In some cases, VA reverted to baseline levels after 10 years; in others, it declined significantly below baseline. Meta-regression showed that mean VA change was greater in those with a lower baseline VA and those treated with a higher number of injections over 10-years(p < 0.01).
conclusionOur findings suggest that the mean visual acuity of eyes treated for nAMD deteriorates progressively over the long-term from two years after starting treatment. Regular injections appear crucial for preserving maximum vision. While our analysis did not identify an increased incidence of serious ocular adverse events, the long-term impact of anti-VEGF therapy on geographic atrophy remains unclear and warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.