Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40411333›Full record

ReviewProblemy endokrinologii2025

[The history of the pharmacotherapy of obesity].

M A Berkovskaya, O Yu Gurova, E V Surkova, V V Fadeev

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Problemy endokrinologii, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M A BerkovskayaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University).
O Yu GurovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University).
E V SurkovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University).
V V FadeevI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The obesity epidemic is a major public health problem nowadays. The pathophysiology of obesity, which underlies its chronic, progressive, self-sustaining course, determines the difficulties in developing effective and safe methods for body weight control. The article is dedicated to the consideration of the evolution of conservative treatment of obesity, in particular, the history of pharmacotherapy of this disease, characterized by many ups and downs, is presented. The paper discusses, in chronological order, the emergence, efficacy, mechanisms of action, and described side effects of drugs that were investigated and used for weight loss at one time or another, as well as the reasons why many of them were subsequently withdrawn from the market. Until recently, long-term effective and safe pharmacotherapy of obesity remained an insurmountable challenge. Only in the last two decades has the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of appetite control reached a level that allows for a more productive search and development of promising drugs aimed at the pathogenetic treatment of obesity. This article discusses the status of currently available drugs for weight loss, as well as the prospects for drug treatment of obesity. The results of clinical trials of advanced therapeutic molecules, including gastrointestinal hormone receptor agonists, reinforce the belief that a breakthrough in the drug treatment of obesity is possible.

Indexed as

Anti-Obesity AgentsObesityHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansWeight LossAnti-Obesity Agents

Identifiers

PMID40411333
PMCPMC12117989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.