Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40411254›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association2025

Obstetric care in rural critical access hospitals: A domestic application of the World Health Organization Emergency Obstetric Care framework in rural communities.

Annie L Glover, Diane Brown, Carly Holman, Megan Nelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Obstetric care in rural critical access hospitals: A domestic application of the World Health Organization Emergency Obstetric Care framework in rural communities.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annie L GloverRural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6073-5760
Diane BrownRural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-960X
Carly HolmanRural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5370-8350
Megan NelsonRural Institute for Inclusive Communities, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7850-9047

Funding

Health Services and Resources Administration (HRSA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) State Maternal Health Innovation Program U7AMC33718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePregnancy-related mortality has increased steadily over the last 30 years in the United States; during the same period, rural communities have lost access to care as rural hospitals and obstetric units have shut their doors. Rural critical access hospitals (CAHs) are often the only option for a pregnant person in a rural community needing emergency care. This study aimed to apply a uniform assessment of the capacity of hospitals that do not have obstetric units to meet the emergency obstetric care needs of the rural communities they serve, with the goal of facilitating ongoing obstetric emergency readiness assessments that can be used in the rural context.

methodsThe study team conducted facility assessments across Montana's statewide system of hospital care. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Levels of Care Assessment Tool (LOCATe) was used in hospitals with an obstetrics unit (N = 25). The team adapted the World Health Organization (WHO) Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) framework to assess readiness in hospitals without an obstetrics unit (N = 34) but with Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA)-based obligations to patients presenting to emergency departments with obstetric emergencies.

findingsNone of the responding hospitals without obstetric units met criteria indicating readiness to provide comprehensive emergency obstetric care (CEmOC), and only one hospital met criteria indicating readiness to provide basic emergency obstetric care (BEmOC).

conclusionSignificant work must be done to bring CAHs up to a level of readiness where they can safely and effectively screen, stabilize, and transfer or accept an obstetric emergency. The WHO EmOC framework can provide a starting point for assessing the capacity of hospitals without obstetric units, but a standardized assessment, such as LOCATe, should be developed to improve readiness for obstetric emergencies.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalHospitals, RuralObstetricsRural Health ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMontanaPregnancyRural PopulationUnited StatesWorld Health Organizationemergency carematernity careobstetricsrural hospitals

Identifiers

PMID40411254
PMCPMC12102685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.