ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2025
Harnessing deep learning for wheat variety classification: a convolutional neural network and transfer learning approach.
Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComputer vision and the use of image-based solutions are gaining traction as non-destructive food assessment methods because of the low costs of computational equipment. Research conducted on the development of wheat classification models has been based on limited data and a smaller number of classes compared to the availability of wheat varieties. To assess the applicability of convolutional neural network (CNN) models, the present study prepared multi-view images of 124 wheat varieties. Using deep learning (DL) methods, a four-layered CNN model was developed from scratch, and popular architectures, DenseNet201, MobileNet and InceptionV3 were trained using transfer learning.
resultsThe proposed CNN model, DenseNet201, MobileNet and InceptionV3 models achieved classification accuracies of 95.40%, 92.41%, 90.54% and 83.47%, respectively, and they were found to be both promising and successful. Despite the challenges related to high computational resource demands, the newly proposed CNN model outperformed the pretrained models. It can be inferred that the multi-view, large-image dataset contributed significantly to the model's success in achieving promising accuracy in the challenging task of classifying 124 wheat varieties.
conclusionThe present study recommends further fine-tuning of hyperparameters to improve the accuracy of the proposed CNN model and to identify better configurations. Besides, other popular models should be evaluated. Moreover, by freezing specific early layers, fine-tuning should be performed to maximize accuracy. Additionally, the image datasets used will be publicly available to allow researchers to discover new methodologies to classify wheat varieties. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.