Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40411213›Full record

ReviewThe Biochemical journal2025

Reconstituted systems for studying the architecture and dynamics of actin networks.

Alice Cantat, Alexandra Colin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Biochemical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alice CantatInterdisciplinary Research Institute of Grenoble, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, CytoMorpho Lab, University of Grenoble-Alpes, CEA, CNRS, INRA, Grenoble, France.
Alexandra ColinInterdisciplinary Research Institute of Grenoble, Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire & Végétale, CytoMorpho Lab, University of Grenoble-Alpes, CEA, CNRS, INRA, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9144-3282

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actin, a ubiquitous protein essential for numerous cellular functions, is found in all eukaryotes. Despite extensive research across molecular to organismal scales, fundamental questions persist regarding the regulation of dynamic actin architectures, their interaction with membranes, and their mechanical properties. Characterizing the factors governing these processes presents significant challenges. This review emphasizes the value of simplified, reconstituted systems in addressing these unresolved questions. We particularly highlight the critical importance of macroscopic, network-level reconstitutions for tackling these issues. We first describe the available methodological toolkit for (1) controlling actin polymerization spatiotemporally and (2) confining actin networks within closed environments to examine boundary constraint effects or the impact of limited component availability on network properties. We then review studies employing these reconstituted systems to investigate how actin architecture influences various processes and how dynamic actin structures are established and maintained. Further, we discuss how network-level reconstitutions have enhanced our understanding of actin networks' mechanical properties and their interaction with the lipid membranes. Throughout the review, we discuss future perspectives for each topic and explain how macroscale reconstitutions can provide deeper mechanistic insights into actin-related processes.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActinsAnimalsHumansActinsactinadaptabilityconfined environmentmembrane interactionmicrofabricationmicropatternsreconstituted systemssize controlturnover

Identifiers

PMID40411213
PMCPMC12203972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.