SynthesisActa physiologica (Oxford, England)2025
Neutrophil Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Acta physiologica (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Rethinking secondary immunodeficiency: a cross-domain pathway framework for risk stratification.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Immature Neutrophil Phenotype and Enhanced Myeloperoxidase in Male Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Cardiovascular Comorbidity.Acta physiologica (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Impact of sex on the association between neutrophil percentage-to-albumin ratio and mortality in perioperative patients with chronic kidney disease: a retrospective analysis of the INSPIRE database.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Immune mechanisms in chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder: current insights and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased cardiovascular risk. Since neutrophils play a central role in atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease, this study analyzed neutrophil function in CKD patients.
methodsA systematic review of neutrophil function in CKD patients compared to controls was performed according to PRISMA guidelines by searching PubMed and the Web of Science. A meta-analysis summarized the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in CKD patients on dialysis in Forest plots. Influencer outlier analyses evaluated risk of bias.
resultsOverall, 92 studies were included, of which 18 in the meta-analysis. Although study heterogeneity was high, the systematic review identified primarily reduced phagocytosis capacity but increased neutrophil degranulation and basal ROS production in neutrophils from CKD patients on hemodialysis compared to controls. Phagocytosis and basal ROS production were mainly unaltered in non-dialysis dependent CKD patients and CKD patients on peritoneal dialysis. The meta-analysis confirmed increased ROS generation in basal conditions predominantly in CKD patients on hemodialysis (Hedges g = 1.20, 95% CI: [0.32; 2.09]), with an insufficient study number for a clear comparison to CKD patients on peritoneal dialysis. However, upon neutrophil stimulation with sterile inflammatory triggers, ROS production was also increased in neutrophils from patients on peritoneal dialysis (Hedges g = 0.89, 95% CI: [0.34; 1.43]).
conclusionIncreased degranulation and basal ROS formation were observed in neutrophils of CKD patients on hemodialysis, which could contribute to their increased cardiovascular risk. Future studies should compare neutrophil activity in patients of different CKD stages and comorbidities also in relation to cardiovascular outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.