ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025
Incidental finding of maternal sex chromosome aneuploidy from DMD carrier screening and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based prenatal cell-free DNA screening.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidental finding of maternal sex chromosome aneuploidy from DMD carrier screening and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based prenatal cell-free DNA screening.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT): A Paradigm Shift in Prenatal Care.International journal of preventive medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening and carrier screening (CS) may have incidental findings that have implications for maternal health outside the scope of the test. We investigated outcome information for individuals with both a DMD full gene deletion/duplication on CS and a suspected maternal X chromosome abnormality on SNP-based prenatal cfDNA screening. This retrospective analysis included de-identified data from pregnant individuals referred for CS and prenatal cfDNA screening at a single reference laboratory (9/2019-12/2021). Maternal karyotype and/or chromosomal microarray analysis results were requested from referring clinics for individuals with both DMD full gene deletion/duplication on CS and prenatal cfDNA screening results indicating potential maternal X chromosome aneuploidy. Of 333,814 individuals screened, 144 (1 in 2318) met study criteria, and for 84 (58.3%) we obtained information on whether diagnostic testing was received following these results. Of the 84 patients with follow-up information available, 34 (40.5%) received maternal diagnostic testing based on karyotype or chromosomal microarray analysis. At 97% (n = 33), the majority of patients with diagnostic testing had X chromosome aneuploidies, including trisomy X (n = 22, 64.7%), monosomy X mosaicism (n = 8, 24.2%), monosomy X (n = 2, 6.1%), and maternal X chromosome structural abnormality (n = 1, 2.9%). Our study supports a high likelihood of maternal sex chromosome abnormality in the presence of an inconclusive DMD result on CS and prenatal cfDNA screening suspicious for a maternal sex chromosome abnormality. Given the implications for maternal health, follow-up counseling, karyotype, and chromosomal microarray analysis may be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.