Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40411176›Full record

Trial reportJournal of genetic counseling2025

Assessing perceived empathy based on genetic counselor gender using a randomized, hypothetical prenatal genetic counseling scenario design.

Luis Torres, Clara Lajonchere, Rebecca LeShay Araujo, Carole H Browner, Christina G S Palmer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luis TorresUCLA Department of Human Genetics, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-3233-0725
Clara LajonchereUCLA Institute for Precision Health, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3190-4606
Rebecca LeShay AraujoUCLA Department of Human Genetics, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Carole H BrownerSemel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Christina G S PalmerUCLA Department of Human Genetics, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

UCLA MS in Genetic Counseling Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Males in the genetic counseling field report facing negative perceptions related to their empathic ability. While these experiences have been explored qualitatively from the genetic counselor (GC) perspective, there currently is no research on the counselee or observer perspective of GC empathy as a function of GC gender. Our study aimed to determine whether individuals from the lay population perceive written empathic responses in a genetic counseling text scenario to be less empathetic from a genetic counselor who is written to be a man compared with a woman GC. Using a randomized two-arm trial with parallel groups, 139 participants were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk, and 138 were presented with a hypothetical scripted prenatal genetic counseling scenario in written form involving a couple being counseled by either a male GC or female GC. Participants rated GC empathy based on a modified Consultation and Relational Empathy measure. Demographic characteristics and an item asking for the identification of GC gender were collected. Regression analyses were performed to identify whether GC gender and other demographic variables predicted empathy ratings. The primary analysis (N = 138) did not demonstrate a significant difference in empathy ratings based on GC gender. Exploratory analyses of a subsample who accurately recalled GC gender (N = 75) and a subsample re-grouped based on participants' report of GC gender (N = 126) show that the scenario with a scripted male GC received lower average empathy rating than the scenario with a female GC (p's < 0.05). Furthermore, we demonstrate that participants who reported having prior genetic counseling experience in a non-prenatal setting rate empathy as lower than those with prenatal experience. Overall, exploratory results suggest empathy is perceived by the lay population as different between a male and female GC, even when the content and dialogue of a written counseling scenario are identical. Further research is warranted to investigate GC gender and empathy.

Indexed as

CounselorsEmpathyGenetic CounselingAdultFemaleHumansMaleSex Factorsbiasdiversityempathygender differencesgenetic counselorstigma

Identifiers

PMID40411176
PMCPMC12102639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.