Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410868›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Does volunteering benefit students' happiness, social connectedness, and self-efficacy? an interaction with gender.

Fatimah Hamdi Alganami, Mogeda El Sayed El Keshky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fatimah Hamdi AlganamiDepartment of Clinical Psychology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mogeda El Sayed El KeshkyDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. drmogeda@gmail.com.

Funding

The Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University (KAU), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia PH:016-246-1443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVolunteering has been found to offer benefits for volunteers, but there is little research on how volunteering could benefit individuals' happiness, social connectedness, and self-efficacy in the context of Saudi Arabia.

methodsThis study was conducted among university students. Overall, 750 students completed the questionnaire, but a total number of 630 respondents (mean age = 29.15, SD = 9.92, around 75% women) had no missing data and were included in the study. They completed the Subjective Happiness Scale, the Social Connectedness Scale, and the New Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale, as well as demographic and volunteering experience questions. Multiple regression and a moderation analysis were employed to study the relationships.

resultsThere was a positive relationship between volunteering and social connectedness, between duration of volunteering and social connectedness, and between duration of volunteering and happiness. The moderation analysis indicated that the relationships between volunteering and happiness and social connectedness were stronger in men than women, and the relationship between duration of volunteering and happiness was stronger in women than men.

conclusionsVolunteering appears to be related to students' well-being, and raising awareness of this should be an agenda. The impact of gender should also be considered in volunteering programs.

Indexed as

HappinessInterpersonal RelationsSelf EfficacyStudentsVolunteersAdultFemaleHumansMaleSaudi ArabiaSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultGenderHappinessSaudi ArabiaSelf-efficacySocial connectednessVolunteering

Identifiers

PMID40410868
PMCPMC12102850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.