ArticleBMC medical education2025
Disability training for healthcare workers in Uganda: qualitative findings from the pilot test.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeople with disabilities experience barriers to healthcare, resulting in poorer health outcomes. There is limited disability training for healthcare workers globally. A disability training was co-developed with people with disabilities and healthcare workers and pilot-tested in Uganda.
objectiveTo use qualitative methods to understand co-learning experiences, identify strengths and areas for improvement, and to explore a disability training's effect on practices in Uganda.
methodsWe conducted a two-day Train-the-Trainer programme in September 2023 with ten trainers (5 people with disabilities, 5 healthcare workers). The trainers then delivered two one-day disability training programmes to 27 healthcare workers. Data on the perceptions and experience of the trainings were collected through focus group discussions with trainers and in-depth interviews with trainers and participants. We used an inductive approach for analysis and Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model to assess reactions, learning, behaviour changes, and results.
resultsThe trainers valued the emphasis on practical application and the collaborative approach used during the sessions. Trainers with disabilities expressed increased confidence and ability to advocate for inclusive healthcare practices. Healthcare workers reported that the training was engaging and relevant to their roles. Three months post-training, healthcare workers reported improved attitudes and skills toward providing care for people with disabilities. Challenges in applying new practices included limitations in facility accommodations and accessibility. Further support and training were requested.
conclusionThe co-designed disability training programme can enhance healthcare workers' skills and interactions with patients with disabilities. Policy support is important for the implementation of disability training at scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.