Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410807›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025

Adaptation of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) to a Polish version and validation in patients with upper limb musculoskeletal disorders.

Agnieszka Bejer, Jędrzej Płocki, Marek Kulczyk, Markus Melloh

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Agnieszka BejerFaculty of Health Sciences and Psychology, Collegium Medicum, University of Rzeszow, Rejtana16C, Rzeszow, 35-959, Poland. abejer@ur.edu.pl.
Jędrzej PłockiNew Medical Techniques, Specialist Hospital of St. Family in Rudna Mała, Rudna Mała 600, Głogów Małopolski, 36-060, Poland.
Marek KulczykNew Medical Techniques, Specialist Hospital of St. Family in Rudna Mała, Rudna Mała 600, Głogów Małopolski, 36-060, Poland.
Markus MellohInstitute of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, Winterthur, 8400, Switzerland.

Funding

Rzeszów University, Poland INoZ-4/2024/W
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) is a robust, widely used tool for assessing the functional status of the upper limbs (ULs) and the effectiveness of interventions in patients with musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the ULFI into Polish (ULFI-PL) and evaluate its psychometric properties and practical characteristics.

methodsA total of 127 patients (54% female,

resultsThe ULFI-PL demonstrated a good internal consistency (α = 0.77) and high construct validity, supported by the confirmation of five out of six a priori hypotheses (83.33%). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed a unidimensional structure. It also demonstrated a high test-retest reliability (r = 0.85). The measurement error was calculated using the standard error of measurement (SEM = 4.75%) and the minimal detectable change (MDC

conclusionsThe ULFI-PL is a reliable, valid, and responsive tool for assessing the upper limb function in Polish-speaking patients with ULMSDs and is suitable for use in both clinical and research contexts. The results are consistent with previous studies on the original English version and other language adaptations.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationMusculoskeletal DiseasesUpper ExtremityAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandPsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesOutcome measurePsychometricsQuestionnaireUpper limb

Identifiers

PMID40410807
PMCPMC12100828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.