Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410794›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

A protocol for randomized controlled trial on early active flexion versus passive flexion mobilization therapy for Spaghetti wrist injuries.

Kishore Vellingiri, Ashwath M Acharya, Anil K Bhat

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kishore VellingiriDepartment of Hand Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.
Ashwath M AcharyaDepartment of Hand Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India. anm.acharya@manipal.edu.
Anil K BhatDepartment of Hand Surgery, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpaghetti-wrist injuries representing Zone-5 flexor tendon lacerations remain a major challenge for hand surgeons despite the use of careful and meticulous surgical techniques and appropriate rehabilitation programs. Injuries in these regions can lead to adhesion formation, stiffness, and loss of hand function in view of its delicate and complex anatomy. One of the methods to prevent adhesion is the use of active flexion rehabilitation protocols. Its benefits have been shown in numerous reports on zone-2 injuries. However, there is a paucity of reports for this regime in Zone-5 and Spaghetti-wrist injuries.

methodsThis study proposes a double-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the functional results of two rehabilitation methods following the repair of Spaghetti-wrist injuries. This includes the passive or active flexion therapy regime performed over six weeks. After fulfilling the inclusion criteria, adults aged 18-60 who have presented with spaghetti-wrist injuries will be selected. Patients will receive a comprehensive document outlining the study's purpose, methodology, and follow-up schedule, which will be a part of the informed consent. 44 patients will be immobilized in a plaster slab and assigned equally to the passive or active flexion group. They will be assessed for primary and secondary outcomes, which include Tang's criteria, independent digital function, sensory assessment, pinch and grip strength, and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MCHQ), each at six and 12 weeks, six and 12 months. The study will follow the SPIRIT guidelines. DISCUSSION: The proposed RCT compares early active and passive flexion regimes' functional results in zone-5 flexor tendon injuries. This trial is unique as an active flexion regime was not described earlier in a major comparison study. It will answer the role and possible benefits of a more aggressive early active flexion program. Additionally, the study will give information on patient-reported outcomes and address the incidence of complications in a much longer follow-up of one year. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: The institute ethics committee approval was confirmed for the study (approval No. IEC - 383/2022), and registration for the Clinical Trial Registry of India was completed (CTRI/2023/03/050721).

Indexed as

Tendon InjuriesWrist InjuriesAdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultFlexor tendon injuryFlexor tendon rehabilitationSpaghetti wrist injuryZone-5

Identifiers

PMID40410794
PMCPMC12102783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.