Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410777›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Factors influencing undergraduate and newly graduated nursing students' competence and attitudes toward nursing research: a structural equation modeling analysis.

Abdulaziz Mofdy Almarwani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdulaziz Mofdy AlmarwaniDepartment of Nursing Administration and Education, College of Nursing, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia. ammrwani@taibahu.edu.sa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3927-2188

Funding

Taibah University TB 2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNursing research is integral to advancing evidence-based practice (EBP), providing the foundation for informed decision-making in the nursing profession. Moreover, nurse-led research plays a pivotal role in enhancing patient outcomes, underscoring the importance of cultivating robust research competencies among nursing students.

aimThe study investigated the factors influencing attitudes toward nursing research and their impact on perceived competence in learning nursing research among undergraduate nursing students and newly graduated nursing students.

methodsA cross-sectional research design was employed, utilizing convenience sampling of 309 undergraduate and newly graduated nursing students from various universities and hospitals in Saudi Arabia. The Revised Attitudes Toward Research (R-ATR) and the Perceived Competence Scale (PCS) were employed to assess attitudes and perceived competence. The data were analyzed utilizing IBM SPSS version 27.0 and IBM SPSS AMOS version 24.0, using confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling.

resultsSatisfaction with research skills significantly predicted research anxiety, while research participation, satisfaction with research skills, and college support were significant predictors of research usefulness and positive research predispositions. English proficiency level was the only demographic variable impacting nursing students' perceived competence.

conclusionsThe study underscores the intricate interplay between attitudes toward research and perceived competence among undergraduate and newly graduated nursing students. Targeted interventions promoting research skills, active participation, and college support are recommended to foster positive attitudes and competence among nursing students.

Indexed as

Evidence-based practiceNursing researchNursing studentsPerceived competence

Identifiers

PMID40410777
PMCPMC12103027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.