Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410776›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Clinical prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer: a machine learning study.

Chongwu He, Tenghua Yu, Liu Yang, Longbo He, Jin Zhu, Jing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chongwu He *Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Tenghua Yu *Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Liu Yang *Department of Pathology, Nanchang People's Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Longbo HeDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Jin ZhuDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Medical College, Jiangxi Cancer Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Nursing, Nanchang Medical College, No. 689, Huiren Avenue, Xiaolan Economic Development Zone, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, China. chenjing1247@126.com.

Funding

General Project of Jiangxi Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine 2024B0854Jiangxi Cancer Hospital Doctoral Start-up Fund BSQDJ202309Jiangxi Province Gan Po Talent Support Program 20232BCJ23035National Natural Science Foundation of China 82160565Science and Technology Program Project of Health Commission of Jiangxi Province 202510069Science and Technology Research Project of Jiangxi Provincial Education Department GJJ2203530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to predict pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer patients.

methodsClinical and pathological data from 1143 patients were analyzed, encompassing variables such as age, gender, marital status, histologic grade, T stage, N stage, months from diagnosis to treatment, molecular subtype, and response to neoadjuvant therapy. Seven machine learning models were trained and validated using both internal and external datasets. Model performance was evaluated using multiple metrics, and interpretability analysis was conducted to assess feature importance.

resultsKey variables influencing pCR included grade, N stage, months from diagnosis to treatment, and molecular subtype. The Naive Bayes model emerged as the most effective, with accuracy (0.746), sensitivity (0.699), specificity (0.808), and F1 score (0.759) surpassing other models. Both internal and external validation confirmed the model's robust predictive power. A web tool was developed for clinical use, aiding in personalized treatment planning. Interpretability analysis further elucidated the contribution of features to pCR prediction, enhancing clinical applicability.

conclusionThe Naive Bayes model provides a robust tool for personalized treatment decisions in patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy. By accurately predicting pCR rates, it enables clinicians to tailor treatment strategies, potentially improving outcomes.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMachine LearningAdultAgedBayes TheoremFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerMachine learningPathological complete responsePCRPrediction

Identifiers

PMID40410776
PMCPMC12102924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.