Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410743›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Preventative behavioural interventions that reduce health inequities: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework.

Kalpa Pisavadia, Rhiannon Tudor Edwards, Ceryl Teleri Davies, Ashley Gould, John Parkinson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kalpa PisavadiaCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK. kalpa.pisavadia@bangor.ac.uk.
Rhiannon Tudor EdwardsCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK.
Ceryl Teleri DaviesCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Gwynedd, LL57 2PZ, UK.
Ashley GouldPublic Health Wales, Behavioural Science Unit, Cardiff, UK.
John ParkinsonWales Centre for Behaviour Change, Department of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWider determinants of health, such as the conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work and age influence health and well-being, often contributing to health inequities. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify preventative behavioural interventions that reduce health inequities or inequalities and to analyse which theoretical domains have been used in the intervention design and implementation.

methodsBehavioural interventions that reduced health inequities and inequalities were identified with use of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Interventions that were aimed at individuals within the axes of inequality and used the TDF in the design and implementation met our inclusion criteria. Periodicals indexed in EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases were selected to undertake this review. Grey literature was sought from UK local government organisations, as the sector with significant influence over these determinants. A minimum of two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen, critically appraise and synthesise included studies.

resultsThis systematic review identified a total of 41 articles which includes n = 33 primary studies and n = 8 local government reports of behavioural interventions that reduce inequalities for populations within the axes of inequality. Most of the evidence demonstrated that behavioural interventions significantly improved health outcomes and contributed towards positive behavioural changes in health and well-being. A large proportion of the evidence base consist of interventions focusing on diet and exercise uptake (n = 15) specifically aimed at ethnic minorities and those of immigrants and refugee status.

conclusionMost of the included studies incorporated elements from contemporary behavioural theory. Most health interventions identified in this review included a component to raise awareness and educate their target audience. However, whilst there was often an evidenced based rationale for use of a preventative behavioural intervention, specific frameworks were rarely used to align problems with solutions in a theoretically defined manner. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42024553898.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth PromotionHealth Status DisparitiesHumansUnited KingdomBehavioural interventionCOM-BEconomically disadvantagedEthnic minoritiesGender inequalitiesHealth promotionIll housedLow socioeconomic statusPovertyPreventionTheoretical domains framework

Identifiers

PMID40410743
PMCPMC12100845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.