ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Title of the study: finite element analysis of five internal fixation modalities for Schatzker type IV‒C tibial plateau fractures.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Breaking the treatment dilemma of Schatzker IV fractures: finite element analysis validates hybrid single-plate with tension screw fixation for synergistic optimization of stability and minimally invasive outcomes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aims to evaluate the biomechanical performance of five different internal fixation strategies for Schatzker type IV-C tibial plateau fractures using three-dimensional finite element analysis. By analyzing stress distribution and displacement patterns under physiological load, we seek to identify optimal fixation modalities for clinical application.
methodsWe established a three-dimensional finite element model of Schatzker IV-C tibial plateau fractures and evaluated five internal fixation modalities via finite element analysis. These modalities included a medial plate (Model 1), a medial plate with two posterior tension screws (Model 2), a medial plate with two lateral tension screws (Model 3), a posterior medial double plate (Model 4), and a medial lateral double plate (Model 5). To simulate the biomechanics of unilateral knee axial compression during normal adult gait, an axial force of 1,200 newtons (N) was applied, with 60% of the force distributed to the medial plate. We comprehensively analyzed equivalent von Mises stresses, displacements, and equivalent stress-displacement plots for each fixation.
resultsModel 5 demonstrated the best overall performance in terms of internal fixation stress (91.46 MPa) and fracture block stress (10.826 MPa), suggesting optimal stress distribution and fracture block protection. Model 3 performed best in terms of internal fixation displacement (4.391 mm), suggesting an advantage in fracture block stability. While the models performed well in several areas, the double plate fixation scheme was superior in terms of stress distribution and fracture stability. It is ideal for managing complex fractures.
conclusionsA single medial plate (Model 1) provides adequate fixation and stability for fractures without the lateral intercondylar ridge. Lag screws with the medial plate (Models 2 and 3) effectively reduce stress and minimize trauma. Double plate on the posterior medial side (Model 4) significantly enhances fixation and prevents displacement for complex fractures. Medial-lateral double plate fixation (Model 5) provides the most favorable biomechanical stability for fractures with extensive lateral plateau comminution. However, balance the benefits against increased complexity, particularly in patients with compromised soft tissue or high functional demands. Selecting internal fixation based on the fracture line can optimize outcomes and speed recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.