ArticleBMC primary care2025
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on glycaemic and blood pressure control among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care in Hong Kong.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Primary Care Utilisation: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the impact of social distancing measures due to COVID-19 pandemic on glycemic and blood pressure control in primary care in Hong Kong.
methodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional study. Diabetic patients with regular follow-up in 8 public primary care clinics in Hong Kong within the study period were recruited. The outcomes were to detect any difference of HbA1c levels and BP between pre-pandemic group (2019 group) and the 1-year post-pandemic group (2020 group) in all patients and in sub-group analysis of different age groups, sex, body mass index, presence of diabetic complications and different diabetic treatment.
resultsThere was no statistically significant change in HbA1c level between 2020 and 2019 groups which was 0.019% (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.057% to 0.094%, p = 0.632). There was also no statistically significant change in both systolic and diastolic BP between 2020 and 2019 groups which were -0.143 mmHg (95%CI -1.005 mmHg to 0.719 mmHg, p = 0.745) and 0.148 mmHg (95%CI -0.422 mmHg to 0.718 mmHg, p = 0.611). Subgroup analysis showed that female gender had statistically significant improvement in glycaemic control (HbA1c 6.92% in 2020 group versus HbA1c 7.03% in 2019 group, p = 0.021). Patients with diabetic retinopathy had statistically significant lower diastolic BP (diastolic BP 73 mmHg in 2020 group versus diastolic BP 75 mmHg in 2019 group with p = 0.011).
conclusionsDespite the implementation of various social distancing measures resulting in significant change in lifestyle, COVID-19 pandemic did not worsen glycaemic and blood pressure control in T2DM patients. In fact, slight improvement in glycaemic control among female patients was found.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.