Trial reportBMC cancer2025
Effects of individualized PEEP on pulmonary function, cerebral blood flow and postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.
Trial report in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effects of individualized PEEP on pulmonary function, cerebral blood flow, and postoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer.
methods100 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical rectal cancer surgery at our hospital between August 2021 and May 2023 were randomized into two groups: the DP group (optimal PEEP group oriented to driving pressure) and the Cdyn group (optimal PEEP group oriented to pulmonary compliance). Anesthesia was induced in both groups with 0.3 mg/kg of remizolam + 0.15 mg/kg of CIS atracurium + 0.5 ug/kg of sufentanil. Lung ultrasound score (LUS), peak and plateau airway pressures (PEAK, PLAT), oxygenation index (OI), driving pressure (DP), and pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cdyn) were measured at different time points. Cerebral blood flow and cognitive function were also assessed. T
resultsThere were no significant differences in general information between the two groups, P > 0.05. Compared with the DP group, the Cdyn group had lower LUS at T
conclusionPEEP guided by lung compliance improves pulmonary function, cerebral blood flow, and cognitive function, offering clinical benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.