ArticleBMC public health2025
Loneliness and ease of communication with parents and friends: cross-sectional study of adolescents in Denmark.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Loneliness and Ostracism in Adolescents' Psychological Well-Being and Substance Use: Family and Teacher Support as Moderators.Journal of adolescence · 2026Article
- Revisiting the Proximal Dominance Assumption: Community Social Inclusion in an Ecological Analysis of Finnish Adolescent Mental Health.Psychology research and behavior management · 2026Article
- Personality traits and loneliness in school-aged children with perceived hearing difficulties: results from a large-scale Norwegian study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoneliness in adolescence is a serious threat to quality of life. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between loneliness and ease of communication with parents and friends, and whether the association was different for boys and girls.
methodsThe study used data from the Danish arm of the international Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC). The surveys in 2010, 2014 and 2018 included nationally representative samples of students in the age groups, 11-, 13- and 15-year-olds (n = 10,425). Loneliness was measured by one item and ease of communication with parents and friends by the HBSC Ease of Communication Measure. Multilevel multivariate logistic regression was applied to study the associations between ease of communication and loneliness. Stratified analysis and interaction analysis tested the modifying effect of sex on the associations.
resultsThe prevalence of loneliness wa 4.3% among boys and 7.6% among girls. There was a strong negative association between loneliness and ease of communication. Compared to participants who found it very easy to communicate with their parents, those who found it very difficult were more likely to feel lonely (OR: 7.64, 95% CI: 5.74-10.15). The association was stronger for girls (OR: 11.89 (8.30-17.02)) than for boys (OR: 3.70 (1.98-6.91)). Similarly, participants who found it very difficult to communicate with friends were more likely to feel lonely than those that found it very easy (OR: 7.71 (5.87-10.12)), again this was stronger among girls (OR: 11.96 (8.19-17.47)) than boys (OR: 4.33 (2.61-7.17)). Analyses of statistical interaction showed that sex was a strong additive effect modifier of these associations.
conclusionThe study found a remarkably strong negative association between loneliness and ease of communication with parents and friends, especially for girls.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.