ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Examining socioeconomic differences in sepsis risk and mediation by modifiable factors: a Mendelian randomization study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEducational attainment is inversely related to sepsis risk, but the causal nature is still unclear. We therefore conducted the first Mendelian randomization (MR) study of genetically predicted educational attainment on sepsis that also uses a within-family genetic instrument for education. To further explore possible mechanistic pathways that can inform strategies to reduce sepsis risk, we examined the mediating effects of factors that are modifiable or can be prevented.
methodsThe association between genetically predicted educational attainment and sepsis was estimated using summary-level data from recent genome-wide association studies. Possible bias due to population stratification, dynastic effects, and assortative mating in the genetic instrument for education was evaluated using summary-level data from a within-sibship genome-wide association study. We used inverse variance weighted MR analysis to estimate the effect of one standard deviation increase in years of education on sepsis risk. The robustness of the findings was assessed in sensitivity analyses, applying weighted median, weighted mode, and MR Egger regression. Finally, we applied multivariable MR analyses to estimate the mediating effects of smoking initiation, alcohol consumption, body mass index, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, systolic blood pressure and type 2 diabetes.
resultsFor each standard deviation increase in genetically predicted educational attainment (3.4 years), the odds ratio (OR) for sepsis was 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 0.78). The results of the analysis using the within-sibship genetic instrument and other sensitivity analyses were in line with this finding: within-sibship OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.18), weighted median OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.62 to 0.80), weighted mode OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.13), and MR Egger OR 0.65 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.85). The mediation analysis showed that 56% of the effect of educational attainment on sepsis risk can be explained by modifiable or preventable factors.
conclusionsHigher educational attainment is strongly associated with a reduced risk of sepsis, pointing to important socioeconomic differences in this disease. The results also suggest that interventions targeting modifiable or preventable factors could contribute to reducing the socioeconomic differences in sepsis risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.