ReviewGenes & nutrition2025
Evaluation of skin cancer prevention properties of probiotics.
Review in Genes & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Probiotic Performance in Food Matrices: From Strain Selection to Bioengineering.Journal of food science · 2026Review
- Actinic Keratosis at the Crossroads of Inflammation and Cutaneous Dysbiosis.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Review
- Recent Research on the Role ofNutrients · 2026Review
- Post-oncologic skin health: cutaneous recovery and rehabilitation after cancer treatments.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- From Gut Dysbiosis to Skin Inflammation in Atopic Dermatitis: Probiotics and the Gut-Skin Axis-Clinical Outcomes and Microbiome Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacteria play a crucial role in human health and disease pathogenesis. In recent years, the therapeutic potential of probiotics has gained increasing attention, with studies suggesting their application in treating various diseases, including cancer. We evaluated clinical data supporting the use of oral and topical probiotics for skin malignancies by conducting a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar. Although limited, clinical trials investigating probiotics in cancer prevention and treatment have shown promising results, particularly in controlling tumor progression and enhancing therapeutic outcomes. Emerging research suggests that probiotics may contribute to skin cancer prevention by modulating the gut and skin microbiomes, enhancing immune responses, exerting antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, and inducing apoptosis. Given their antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects on carcinoma cells, probiotic-based therapies may serve as potential cancer-preventive agents and adjunctive treatments during conventional therapies. Key findings from our review highlight the ability of probiotics to influence cancer progression through immune regulation, apoptosis induction, and modulation of inflammatory pathways. However, further well-designed clinical trials are needed to validate these findings and establish probiotics as a viable therapeutic approach in oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.