ArticleOral radiology2025
Improving TMJ MRI diagnostics in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a comparative evaluation of image enhancement filters.
Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of two enhancement filters for magnetic resonance images of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). MATERIAL: Magnetic resonance image (MRI) of 44 patients with JIA (15 males and 29 females) was analysed using OnDemand 3D
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between Sharpen 1 and Sharpen 2 filters. Both filters provided significantly better images compared to images without filter (P = 0.000), resulting in a greater constancy of images with excellent diagnostic conditions. As for the evaluation of the articular eminences, Sharpen 2 filter provided images with better sharpness, despite the lack of a statistically significant difference.
conclusionThe use of enhancement filters in MRI of patients with JIA was shown to be a valuable means to improve the diagnostic quality. Both Sharpen 1 and Sharpen 2 filters significantly enhanced the visualisation of mandibular condyles and articular eminences, thus potentially facilitating the detection and follow-up of JIA-related changes in these structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40410647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.