ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025
Review of Guidelines for Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) in the Management of Chronic Pain.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Neuromodulation Therapy for Neuropathy Symptom Reduction and Functional Improvement.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis article assesses the current evidence and guidelines on peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) and provides recommendations for its use in managing moderate to severe chronic pain. RECENT
findingsPNS has been utilized for over 50 years in the treatment of chronic pain. However, since 2015, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved percutaneously implanted PNS leads and neurostimulators, providing a minimally invasive, non-opioid alternative for managing persistent and refractory chronic pain. The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) has established evidence-based consensus guidelines for the clinical use of PNS systems in addressing chronic pain. ASIPP guidelines performed extensive evidence synthesis, including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria or certainty of evidence, and qualitative synthesis based on the best available evidence. The evidence level and recommendations showed fair evidence with moderate strength of recommendation for implantable PNS systems following a trial or selective lumbar medial branch stimulation without a trial and for temporary PNS for 60 days. This review offers a comprehensive analysis of peripheral neuropathic pain as a cause of chronic, intractable, function-limiting, and high-impact pain. It discusses the diagnosis of peripheral nerve and neuropathic pain, evidence evaluation and synthesis, medical necessity criteria, patient education, and clinical recommendations. The goal is to enhance patient outcomes by integrating PNS technology into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40410617What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.