ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025
Energy intake and energy expenditure are minimally impacted by acute cold exposure in individuals living with obesity.
Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cold exposure and metabolic health: Therapeutic potential for obesity, diabetes, and beyond.Physiological reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextCold exposure (CE) has been purported to be a possible weight loss strategy and to be anorexigenic, however, the impacts of CE on appetite and energy intake have not been fully explored, more so in individuals living with obesity.
objectiveDetermine the effects of a single dose of moderate CE on energy expenditure, intake, and appetite regulation in individuals living with obesity.
designForty-seven individuals living with obesity (18 males) underwent two experimental sessions, one 90-min CE (10 °C fluid using a liquid conditioned suit) and one control. Energy expenditure (indirect calorimetry), energy intake (food menu), subjective appetite (Visual analogue scales), food reward (Leeds Food Preference Questionnaire), appetite-related peptides (ELISA), skin temperature (Thermocouples), thermal comfort and thermal sensation (Likert scales) were assessed.
resultsCE produced a small (18%) but significant increase in energy expenditure over 90 min (p < 0.001). Energy intake during lunch increased slightly (10%), yet significantly following CE (p = 0.008) before decreasing for the remainder of the day (p = 0.049). There were no differences in subjective appetite (p > 0.05), but there was a decrease in the rewarding value of low-fat sweet foods (p < 0.05). Leptin concentrations decreased significantly (p = 0.004), whereas GLP-1 concentrations were increased (p = 0.003) in response to CE. Thermal comfort and sensation also both decreased significantly during exposure (p < 0.001).
conclusionAlthough both energy expenditure and intake significantly changed, CE caused minimal impacts to energy balance in individuals living with obesity. When combined with the high levels of discomfort, these results question the efficiency of CE as an intervention able to produce meaningful changes in body weight and composition in individuals living with obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40410569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.