ArticleScientific reports2025
Multimodal malware classification using proposed ensemble deep neural network framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advancements in Machine Learning-Assisted Flexible Electronics: Technologies, Applications, and Future Prospects.Biosensors · 2026Pooled it
- Design of an integrated evidence-driven few-shot meta-learning for zero-day malware detection and forensic attributions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Few-shot android malware classification with quantum-enhanced prototypical learning and drift detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MH-1M: A 1.34 Million-Sample Multi-Feature Android Malware Dataset with Rich Metadata.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Graph-augmented multi-modal learning framework for robust android malware detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the contemporary technological world, fortifying cybersecurity defense against dynamic threat landscapes is imperative. Malware detectors play a critical role in this endeavor, utilizing various techniques such as statistical analysis, static and dynamic analysis, and machine learning (ML) to compare signatures and identify threats. Deep learning (DL) aids in accurately classifying complex malware features. The cross-domain research in data fusion strives to integrate information from multiple sources to augment reliability and minimize errors in detecting sophisticated cyber threats. This collaborative approach is the least addressed and pivotal for protecting against the advancing environment of modern malware attacks. This study presents a state-of-the-art malware analysis framework that employs a multimodal approach by integrating malware images and numeric features for effective malware classification. The experiments are performed sequentially, encompassing data preprocessing, feature selection using Neighbourhood Component Analysis (NCA), and dataset balancing with Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). Subsequently, the late fusion technique is utilized for multimodal classification by employing Random Under Sampling and Boosting (RUSBoost) and the proposed ensemble deep neural network. The RUSBoost technique involves random undersampling and adaptive boosting to moderate bias toward majority classes while improving minority class (malware) detection. Multimodal Late fusion experimental results (95.36%) of RUSBoost (numeric) and the proposed model (imagery) outperform the standalone prevailing results for imagery (95.02%) and numeric (93.36%) data. The effectiveness of the proposed model is verified through the evaluation metrics such as Recall (86.5%), F1-score (85.0%), and Precision (79.9%). The multimodal late fusion of numeric and visual data makes the model more robust in detecting diverse malware variants. The experimental outcomes demonstrate that multimodal analysis may efficiently increase the identification strength and accuracy, especially when majority vote and bagging are employed for late fusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.