ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2025
Oral bioaccessibility and probabilistic human health risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in stream sediments from an abandoned gold mine in Panama.
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, the oral bioaccessibility of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) (As, Ba, Cu, Sb, and Zn) in river sediments from the abandoned Remance Mine was evaluated, and the associated human health risks from exposure to these contaminants through accidental ingestion during recreational activities were assessed using a probabilistic approach. The pseudo-total concentrations and bioaccessible fractions (BAF) of the selected PTEs were determined using the Unified BARGE Method (UBM), which simulates the human digestive process for both the gastric (G-phase) and gastrointestinal (GI-phase) phases. The results indicate that the BAF of PTEs was higher in the G-phase than in the GI-phase. In the G-phase, the BAF followed this decreasing order: Cu > Ba > Zn > As > Sb, while in the GI-phase, the order was Cu > Zn > Ba > As > Sb. Regarding the risk assessment, As emerged as the most significant contaminant, exceeding the safe exposure limits for both carcinogenic (CR) and non-carcinogenic (HQ) risk, mainly in children. The CR for the pseudo-total concentration was 10 times higher than in the G-phase and 18 times higher than in the GI-phase. The HQ results indicated values exceeding the safe exposure threshold only in the pseudo-total concentration. These findings highlight that the incorporation of bioaccessibility into risk assessments provides more accurate estimates. This is a novel study, the first one carried out in Panama, which investigates the oral bioaccessibility of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in stream sediments from the Remance gold mine, an area with high concentrations of As, Cu, Zn, Sb, and Ba. Finally, the importance of managing river use in contaminated mining environments is underscored, and some recommendations are provided, aimed to make these sustainable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.