ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Safety and efficiency of robot-assisted aspiration and intraoperative lysis without catheterization for deep-seated intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy of robot-assisted stereotactic aspiration in moderate basal ganglia hemorrhage: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Comment on: "Safety and efficiency of robot-assisted aspiration and intraoperative lysis without catheterization for deep-seated intracerebral hemorrhage".Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional recovery after minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) varies. In this study, we introduce a novel robot-assisted stereotactic aspiration and lysis procedure to evacuate deep-seated ICH and evaluate the efficiency of improving neurologic outcomes. Adult patients with spontaneous ICH less than 40 mL were prospectively recruited and underwent a novel protocol combining aspiration and lysis through a single trajectory planned and executed with a neurosurgical robot. No catheter drainage was required after each procedure. The clot volume and neurologic assessments including Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were compared before and after surgery. Surgical complications and mortality within 30 days and neurological improvement survival (NIS), defined as the day on which the NIHSS had decreased by 3 points postoperatively, were recorded. Fifty-five patients with a mean clot volume of 25.5 mL and ICH score of 2 were enrolled. The overall reduction rate was 84.3%, which was inversely proportional to the initial volume (-0.42, p = 0.041). One patient (1.8%) had subclinical bleeding postoperatively, however, none of the patients died. Comparisons between before and after surgery showed an increase in GCS (11.7 vs. 13.4, p < 0.001), decrease in NIHSS (17.4 vs. 12.1, p < 0.001), and decrease in mRS (3.6 vs. 3.1, p < 0.001). Right hemisphere ICH was associated with better NIS than left ICH (p = 0.025). Robot-assisted stereotactic aspiration and thrombolysis can effectively improve neurological function in patients with deep-seated ICHs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40410448What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.