ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing the effects of typing and handwriting on spelling performance in school.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The widespread integration of digital tools into students' daily lives has raised important questions about their impact on academic performance, particularly in relation to writing and spelling mastery. Three studies investigate how writing modalities-pen-and-paper versus keyboard-and-computer-affect spelling performance in school tasks. A total of 305 students from Grades 4 to 7 participated, completing a standardized copying task and narrative task in both writing conditions. Results showed that, in the copying task, younger students (Grades 4-5) produced higher-quality handwritten texts with greater spelling accuracy, longer text length, and fewer errors per word. However, spelling accuracy in the narrative task did not significantly differ across grades or between writing modalities. Interestingly, no significant differences were found in the types of spelling errors between the two conditions for either task, although an increase in morphological errors was observed in the narrative task from Grades 4-7, possibly reflecting the growing linguistic complexity of French. Overall, task type and grade level strongly influence written production, with the pen-and-paper modality providing an early advantage in spelling during copying tasks, but no consistent impact in narrative tasks. These findings highlight the nuanced role that writing medium and task complexity play in students' academic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.