Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410385›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

Determining a role for Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in genomic data governance for cancer care.

Katherine Sahan, Lesley Turner, Nina Hallowell, Michael Parker, Anneke Lucassen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Beyond the sequence.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Beyond the dataset: integrating public voices in data science.Research involvement and engagement · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine SahanEthox Centre, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Big Data Institute, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK. kate.sahan@ethox.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5948-5581
Lesley TurnerPatient Reference Panel, Cangene Canvar, London, UK.
Nina HallowellEthox Centre, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Big Data Institute, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK.
Michael Parker *Ethox Centre, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Big Data Institute, Old Road Campus, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7054-4711
Anneke Lucassen *Clinical Ethics, Law, and Society (CELS) Oxford, Nuffield Dept of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3324-4338

Funding

Cancer Research UK (CRUK) C61296/A27223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive collections of cancer data, including genomic data, are needed to improve cancer risk prediction and treatments. A recent government review, Better, Broader, Safer: Using health data for research and analysis, has argued for high-quality Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) for ethical data use. In this paper we determine a role and justification for PPIE to govern uses of genomic data in fields like cancer. First, we analyse two public attitudes studies about the role of PPIE in genomics governance. Second, we characterise two ethically-significant features of the context of governing genomic data: 1) data aggregation leading to novel group formation, and 2) the hybrid territory of genomic cancer data uses. Thirdly, we bring together these aspects to describe a fully determined role for PPIE within an approach to governing cancer genomic data, which is tailored to major areas of ethical consideration. Our account is a novel interpretation of what PPIE is for in governance, how it may foster public support and how its success in so doing depends on it being tailored to context.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationGenomicsNeoplasmsPatient ParticipationHumans

Identifiers

PMID40410385
PMCPMC13424578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.