ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026
Determining a role for Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) in genomic data governance for cancer care.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and possibilities of public and patient involvement for early-career researchers: pedagogy, practice and data governance.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Beyond the sequence.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Africa's emerging role in precision oncology: translational insights from the harnessing functional genomics in cancer research conference, Windhoek, 23-26 September 2025.BMC proceedings · 2026Article
- Beyond the dataset: integrating public voices in data science.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Aligning awareness, systems and policy to increase equitable access to genomically driven cancer care.BMJ oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comprehensive collections of cancer data, including genomic data, are needed to improve cancer risk prediction and treatments. A recent government review, Better, Broader, Safer: Using health data for research and analysis, has argued for high-quality Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) for ethical data use. In this paper we determine a role and justification for PPIE to govern uses of genomic data in fields like cancer. First, we analyse two public attitudes studies about the role of PPIE in genomics governance. Second, we characterise two ethically-significant features of the context of governing genomic data: 1) data aggregation leading to novel group formation, and 2) the hybrid territory of genomic cancer data uses. Thirdly, we bring together these aspects to describe a fully determined role for PPIE within an approach to governing cancer genomic data, which is tailored to major areas of ethical consideration. Our account is a novel interpretation of what PPIE is for in governance, how it may foster public support and how its success in so doing depends on it being tailored to context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.