Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410384›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

On the ultra-rapid mixing in two colliding Leidenfrost drops.

Yu-Tung Chiu, Ya-Lin Hsiao, Yuki Morita, Naoto Ohmura, Chen-Li Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu-Tung ChiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106319, Taiwan.
Ya-Lin HsiaoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106319, Taiwan.
Yuki MoritaDepartment of Chemical Science and Engineering, Kobe University, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan.
Naoto OhmuraDepartment of Chemical Science and Engineering, Kobe University, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan.
Chen-Li SunDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, 106319, Taiwan. clsun@ntu.edu.tw.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council NSC 108-2221-E-002-053-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Leidenfrost drop can accelerate chemical reactions, offering great potential for droplet-based chemical reactors. By leveraging their motion on heated surfaces with micro-rachets, we demonstrate that mixing can be further enhanced through head-on collisions of two Leidenfrost drops. This study identifies three mixing stages. In Stage I, collision dynamics and film drainage between drops control coalescence, with surface tension disparities prolonging Stage I for heterogeneous drops. Stage II is driven by advective transport, though viscous effect from deformation can slow internal flow. In Stage III, oscillations promote mixing. For identical drops, complete mixing can be achieved within 2-3 oscillations. However, when drops with different boiling points collide, bubble nucleation emerges from the contact surface. Boiling not only prolongs the transition to Stage III or even disrupts stable oscillations but also hinders mixing through selective evaporation. In this study, the most rapid mixing occurs when two 10 µl Leidenfrost drops of water coalesce. Complete mixing is achieved within 100 ms, about two orders of magnitude faster than conventional methods. The results provide insights into optimizing Leidenfrost drop reactors and highlight the benefits of the extreme mobility of the Leidenfrost state for applications requiring rapid mixing.

Indexed as

Binary collisionCoalescenceLeidenfrost dropMixing processSurface oscillationUnequal size

Identifiers

PMID40410384
PMCPMC12102151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.