SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2026
Acupoint injection increases the efficacy of vitamin B12 for diabetic neuropathy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Vitamin B Supplementation for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitamin B12 acupoint injections compared to other administration routes in treating diabetic neuropathy (DN). We included 20 randomized controlled trials published before March 1, 2024, sourced from eight public databases, involving 1688 participants. Subsequently, we recorded their basic data, investigated their risk of bias, and then carried out a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). The meta-analysis revealed that compared to other administration routes of vitamin B12, acupoint injection significantly improved the clinical effectiveness proportion by 28% (risk ratio [RR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.35), peroneal nerve motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV) by 4.43 m/s (MD 4.43, 95% CI 2.83-6.03), peroneal nerve sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) by 3.82 m/s (MD 3.82, 95% CI 3.23-4.41), median nerve MNCV by 5.48 m/s (MD 5.48, 95% CI 4.71-6.24), and median nerve SNCV by 4.62 m/s (MD 4.62, 95% CI 3.84-5.39) in patients with DN, while having no significant impact on fasting blood glucose (FBG) (MD -0.18, 95% CI -0.44 to 0.08), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (2h-PBG) (MD -0.02, 95% CI -0.36 to 0.33), and the adverse event incidence (RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.44-4.70). TSA indicated that except for FBG, 2h-PBG, and adverse event incidence, the remaining meta-analysis results were conclusive. These findings indicate that compared to other administration routes of vitamin B12, acupoint injection improves neurological function in patients with DN without increasing adverse events and economic burden, suggesting that it may be the optimal administration route for vitamin B12.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40410378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.