ArticleHeredity2025
Evaluating regional heritability mapping methods for identifying QTLs in a wild population of Soay sheep.
Article in Heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Genetics of Host Plant Acceptance in Pea Aphids.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The study of complex traits and their genetic underpinnings is crucial for understanding the evolutionary processes and mechanisms that shape natural populations. Regional heritability mapping (RHM) is a method for estimating the heritability of genomic segments that may contain both common and rare variants affecting a complex trait. This research is important because it advances our ability to detect genetic loci that contribute to phenotypic variation, even those that might be missed by traditional methods such as genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Here, we compare three RHM methods: SNP-RHM, which uses genomic relationship matrices (GRMs) based on SNP genotypes; Hap-RHM, which utilizes GRMs based on haplotypes; and SNHap-RHM, which integrates both SNP-based and haplotype-based GRMs jointly. These methods were applied to data from a wild population of sheep, focusing on the analysis of eleven polygenic traits. The results were compared with findings from previous GWAS to assess how RHM performed at identifying both known and novel associated loci. We found that while the inclusion of the regional matrix did not account for significant variation in all regions associated with trait variation as identified by GWAS, it did uncover several regions that were not previously linked to trait variation. This suggests that RHM methods can provide additional insights into the genetic architecture of complex traits, highlighting regions of the genome that may be overlooked by GWAS alone. This study underscores the importance of using complementary approaches to fully understand the genetic basis of complex traits in natural populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.