ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025
Hounsfield units vs. vertebral bone quality score: which is a better predictor of screw loosening after single-level lumbar interbody fusion?
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computed tomography-derived Hounsfield unit mapping for pedicle screw planning in degenerative lumbar disease: a narrative review.Asian spine journal · 2026Article
- Predictive performance of CT hounsfield units and MRI vertebral bone quality score following single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery: which is better.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo clarify the ability of the preoperative CT Hounsfield units (HU) of the vertebrae and MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score in predicting screw loosening following lumbar interbody fusion.
methodsPatients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent single-level lumbar interbody fusion at five hospitals were enrolled. The HU were assessed at vertebral body and pedicle. The VBQ score was assessed on the T1-weighted sagittal image and defined as the quotient of the median signal intensity of the vertebrae from L1 to L4 divided by the signal intensity of the cerebrospinal fluid. Screw loosening was evaluated by the postoperative CT scans at 12 months or more. Patients were divided into the screw loosening group and no loosening group, and the HU and the VBQ score were compared between the groups.
resultsA total of 107 patients (mean age, 67.8 ± 10.1 years, 62 men) were included. At the vertebral body, the HU of L1, the average HU from L1 to L4, from L1 to L5, and from L1 to S1, and the HU of the upper instrumented vertebra showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The average HU of the vertebral body from L1 to L4 showed the highest AUC of 0.651 and sensitivity of 0.818. No significant difference was found in the HU of the pedicle and VBQ score.
conclusionThe preoperative CT HU of the vertebral bodies could reliably predict screw loosening following lumbar interbody fusion. In contrast, the VBQ score did not predict screw loosening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40410359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.