ArticleScientific reports2025
Research on Chinese patent classification based on structured features.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The three dimensions of Function, Structure, and Purpose are fundamental to patent classification and play a decisive role in improving the accuracy of patent information categorization. By providing targeted abstracts for each of these three dimensions, strong summarization and contextual information can be generated, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of patent text analysis. Leveraging three-dimensional features alongside contextual information significantly improves the precision of patent classification. In alignment with the characteristics of the technical domain and the IPC classification system, this paper proposes a Patent Multilevel Domain Information (PMDI) model, designed to facilitate the targeted extraction of 3D information from patents. The PMDI model effectively captures the core 3D features necessary for classification and subsequently integrates these features into a Multi-Information Processing (MIP) model. This MIP model links the extracted 3D features with the IPC classification framework, resulting in a notable improvement in patent classification accuracy. Empirical results indicate that the summary information extracted by the PMDI model enhances classification accuracy by up to 5.67% compared to conventional deep learning approaches. When integrated with the MIP model, the classification accuracy of the multi-dimensional technology domain classification method reaches an impressive 96.77%. The proposed PMDI model, MIP model, and classification method based on structured patent text features collectively contribute to a substantial improvement in classification performance, offering significant support for knowledge-driven services such as knowledge retrieval and patent management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.