ArticleScientific reports2025
The analysis of strategic management decisions and corporate competitiveness based on artificial intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mining the Collaborative Networks: A Machine Learning-Based Approach to Firm Innovation in the Digital Transformation Era.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enterprise AI applications and stock price crash risk.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This work aims to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of corporate strategic decision-making, particularly in rapidly changing and highly competitive market environments. Traditional strategic decision-making methods rely on managers' experiential judgment and exhibit limitations when handling complex data and high-frequency market fluctuations. To address this issue, this work proposes a hybrid optimization model combining transformer models and reinforcement learning algorithms, designed to optimize corporate strategic decision-making processes and improve competitiveness. First, relevant studies on strategic decision-making and corporate competitiveness are reviewed, clarifying the potential and advantages of artificial intelligence (AI) in decision support. Second, the hybrid model is developed and trained through steps including data collection and preprocessing, algorithm selection and model construction, as well as model training and validation. Finally, real-world data are applied to evaluate model performance across indicators such as training time, convergence speed, and prediction effectiveness. The results demonstrate that the hybrid model successfully converges within 150 iterations and exhibits substantial advantages over traditional algorithms, particularly in prediction accuracy for market share (92%), profit growth rate (91%), and customer satisfaction (89%). Implementing the model leads to notable improvements in corporate market position, brand influence, and technological innovation capabilities. The work shows that the hybrid model enhances the scientific rigor and accuracy of decision-making. Meanwhile, it strengthens corporate competitiveness and market responsiveness, highlighting the substantial potential of AI technologies in strategic management. This work provides enterprises with an efficient and reliable decision-support tool, facilitating the maintenance of competitive advantages in complex and dynamic market environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.