Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410308›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Multinational cross-sectional study and meta-analysis on radicular grooves, C-shaped canals, and taurodontism in mandibular first premolars across 20 countries.

Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu, Güldane Magat, Mohmed Isaqali Karobari, Glynn Dale Buchanan, Maira Kopbayeva, Nessrin Taha, Rafael Fernández-Grisales, Olga Bekjanova, Peter Luu, Sebastian Bürklein and 13 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Fatma Pertek HatipoğluDepartment of Endodontics, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.
Güldane MagatDepartment of Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.
Mohmed Isaqali KarobariDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Saveetha University, Chennai, 600077, Tamil Nadu, India.
Glynn Dale BuchananDepartment of Odontology, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Maira KopbayevaSchool of Dentistry, Department of Therapeutics Dentistry. Almaty, Kazakh National Medical University named after S.D.Asfendiyarov, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Nessrin TahaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Jordan University of Science and Technology Irbid, Irbid, Jordan.
Rafael Fernández-GrisalesDepartment of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, CES University, Medellín, Colombia.
Olga BekjanovaFaculty of Dentistry, Tashkent State Dental Institute, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Peter LuuFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Dental School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sebastian BürkleinCentral Interdisciplinary Ambulance in the School of Dentistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Abdulbaset MufadhalDepartment of Restorative and Aesthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Yemen.
Xenos PetridisDepartment of Endodontics, Section of Dental Pathology and Therapeutics, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
María Fernanda MoraEndodontic department of Dentistry, Universidad Central del Ecuador Quito, Quito, Ecuador.
Surendar SugumaranDepartment of cariology and comprehensive care Dentistry, NYU college of Dentistry, New York, USA.
Safaa AllawiDepartment of Endodontic and Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria.
Anja IvicaUniversity of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Wen Yi LimDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, National Dental Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Abdulrahman FadagEndodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Yemen.
Rohan JagtapDivision of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Department of Care Planning and Restorative Sciences, University of Mississippi Medical Center School of Dentistry, Jackson, MI, 39216, USA.
Tomasz KulczykDept.of Diagnostics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Suha AlfirjaniDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, University of Benghazi, Benghazi, Libya.
Paulo J PalmaCenter for Innovation and Research in Oral Sciences (CIROS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Ömer HatipoğluInstitute of Endodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. omerhtp@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of root canal therapy is fully predicated upon a complete understanding of root and canal morphology and all the anatomical variations that can complicate the endodontic treatment. Of these morphological variations, taurodontism, RGs, and C-shaped canals are of note due to their implications on diagnosis, treatment planning, and endodontic success. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and regional variations of C-shaped canals, RGs, and taurodontism across 20 countries using CBCT imaging and meta-analytic methods. A multicenter, cross-sectional study analyzed CBCT datasets from 6,000 participants (12,000 teeth) distributed equally across 20 countries. Standardized evaluation arrangements were utilized to identify RGs (RG), taurodontism, and C-shaped canals with their prevalence stratified by region, gender, and age. Statistical analyses cover subgroup comparisons, correlation studies, and sensitivity analysis using Cramer's V. RGs had a pooled global prevalence of 20%, with high-rised rates in Africa. C-shaped canals reported a 10% global prevalence, mainly in Asia, On the Other hand taurodontism was lowest prevalent at 7%, with markable regional variability. Prominent bilateral symmetry was noticed for all features, and taurodontism showed the highest rate (98.33%). Important correlations existed among C-shaped canals, grooves, and taurodontism showing shared developmental pathways. The current study points out the significant prevalence, including anatomical variations of RGs, taurodontism, and C-shaped canals in mandibular 1st premolars, with substantial demographic and regional differences. The findings highlight the importance of perception of these features' morphological interrelationships along with bilateral symmetry to increase diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, and treatment planning.

Indexed as

BicuspidDental Pulp CavityMandibleTooth AbnormalitiesTooth RootAdolescentAdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceYoung AdultCone-beam computed tomographyC-shaped canalsEndodonticsMandibular 1 st premolarsPrevalenceTaurodontism

Identifiers

PMID40410308
PMCPMC12102226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.