SynthesisScientific reports2025
Multinational cross-sectional study and meta-analysis on radicular grooves, C-shaped canals, and taurodontism in mandibular first premolars across 20 countries.
Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence of Hypercementosis in Radiographic Studies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Clinical Implications for Endodontic Assessment.International endodontic journal · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative performance of the ahmed and vertucci systems in classifying mandibular premolar canal morphology: a Bayesian and information-theoretic analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Morphological Characteristics of Taurodontism in Permanent First and Second Molars in a Peruvian CBCT Sample.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Assessing the diagnostic performance of MediXpar texture analysis for C-shaped canal morphology on panoramic radiographs: a pilot study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of root canal therapy is fully predicated upon a complete understanding of root and canal morphology and all the anatomical variations that can complicate the endodontic treatment. Of these morphological variations, taurodontism, RGs, and C-shaped canals are of note due to their implications on diagnosis, treatment planning, and endodontic success. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and regional variations of C-shaped canals, RGs, and taurodontism across 20 countries using CBCT imaging and meta-analytic methods. A multicenter, cross-sectional study analyzed CBCT datasets from 6,000 participants (12,000 teeth) distributed equally across 20 countries. Standardized evaluation arrangements were utilized to identify RGs (RG), taurodontism, and C-shaped canals with their prevalence stratified by region, gender, and age. Statistical analyses cover subgroup comparisons, correlation studies, and sensitivity analysis using Cramer's V. RGs had a pooled global prevalence of 20%, with high-rised rates in Africa. C-shaped canals reported a 10% global prevalence, mainly in Asia, On the Other hand taurodontism was lowest prevalent at 7%, with markable regional variability. Prominent bilateral symmetry was noticed for all features, and taurodontism showed the highest rate (98.33%). Important correlations existed among C-shaped canals, grooves, and taurodontism showing shared developmental pathways. The current study points out the significant prevalence, including anatomical variations of RGs, taurodontism, and C-shaped canals in mandibular 1st premolars, with substantial demographic and regional differences. The findings highlight the importance of perception of these features' morphological interrelationships along with bilateral symmetry to increase diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.