Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410295›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The impact of novel bacterial strains and their consortium on diflufenican degradation in the mineral medium and soil.

Paulina Książek-Trela, Leszek Potocki, Ewa Szpyrka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paulina Książek-TrelaFaculty of Biotechnology, Collegium Medicum, University of Rzeszow, 1 Pigonia St, 35-310, Rzeszow, Poland. pksiazek@ur.edu.pl.
Leszek PotockiFaculty of Biotechnology, Collegium Medicum, University of Rzeszow, 1 Pigonia St, 35-310, Rzeszow, Poland.
Ewa SzpyrkaFaculty of Biotechnology, Collegium Medicum, University of Rzeszow, 1 Pigonia St, 35-310, Rzeszow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four novel bacterial strains isolated from agricultural soil were tested for their ability to degrade the persistent herbicide - diflufenican, in a mineral medium and soil. The presence of three potential diflufenican metabolites, 2,4-difluoroaniline, 2-(3-trifluoromethylphenoxy)nicotinamide, and 2-(3-trifluoromethylphenoxy)nicotinic acid, was analysed. The isolated bacterial species were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing as Pseudomonas sp. 10Kp8 - A1, Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aureofaciens strain B19 - A2, Pseudomonas baetica strain JZY4-9 - C1, and Streptomyces atratus strain ROA017 - D1. The effect of each isolate and its consortia on diflufenican degradation was compared to control samples without microorganisms. In the mineral salt medium (MSM) and soil, strain D1 showed the highest degradation, reaching 70.1% and 79%, respectively. However, the application of a synthetic consortium of four microorganisms resulted in even higher degradation in both environments, achieving 74.4% and 82.2% in the liquid medium and the soil, respectively. Notably, the microorganisms were able to grow in MSM containing diflufenican at concentrations of 60-220 mg/kg, utilizing it as a source of carbon and energy. The quadruple synthetic consortium holds promise as a bioremediation technique for reducing the contamination of ecosystems by this persistent herbicide. These findings demonstrate the diversity of diflufenican-degrading bacteria in agricultural soil ecosystems and provide a promising new approach for bioremediation of diflufenican and other persistent herbicides in the agricultural soil.

Indexed as

BacteriaHerbicidesIndenesMicrobial ConsortiaPhenylurea CompoundsSoil MicrobiologySoil PollutantsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalPseudomonasRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilStreptomycesHerbicidesIndenesPhenylurea CompoundsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilSoil PollutantsBiodegradationDiflufenicanHerbicidesMetabolitesPseudomonasStreptomyces

Identifiers

PMID40410295
PMCPMC12102159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.